Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

Capital Planning Committee

City Administrator’s Office

Naomi Kelly, City Administrator and Committee Chair

Board of Supervisors

Supervisor London Breed, Board President

Controller’s Office

Ben Rosenfield, Controller

Mayor’s Budget Office

Melissa Whitehouse, Budget Director

Municipal Transportation Agency

Ed Reiskin, Executive Director

Port of San Francisco

Elaine Forbes, Executive Director

Planning Department

John Rahaim, Director

Public Utilities Commission

Harlan Kelly, General Manager

Public Works

Mohammed Nuru, Director

Recreation and Parks Department

Phil Ginsburg, General Manager

San Francisco International Airport

Ivar Satero, Director


Department Staff

Airport

Kevin Kone, Kaitlyn Connors, Joe Nurisso

Arts Commission

Tom DeCaigny, Rebekah Krell, Kevin Quan

Asian Art Museum

Joanne Chou, Erik Cline

City Administrator & Real Estate

Kenneth Bukowski, Adam Nguyen, John Updike, Claudia Gorham

City Attorney

Kenneth Roux, Mark Blake

Controller’s Office of Public Finance

Nadia Sesay, Vishal Trivedi, Jamie Querubin

Department of Emergency Management

William Lee, Grace Chan, Vivina Santos

Department of Technology

Brian Roberts

Fine Arts Museums

Patty Lacson

Fire Department

Mark Corso, Nalungo Conley

Homelessness and Supportive Housing

Gigi Whitley, Marisa Pereira Tully

Human Services Agency

Robert Walsh

Juvenile Probation

Chief Allen Nance, Eric Ugalde

Library

Luis Herrera, Maureen Singleton, Roberto Lombardi

Mayor’s Office

Theodore Conrad, Tyrone Jue, Gillian Gillett

Mayor’s Office of Disability 

Arfaraz Khambatta, Nicole Bohn

Moscone Center

John Noguchi, Steve Basic

Municipal Transportation Agency

Ariel Espiritu Santo, Jerad Wiener, Jesse Rosemoore

Planning Department

Adam Varat, Mat Snyder, Jacob Bintliff, Diana Sokolove

Police Department

Denise Schmitt, Catherine McGuire, Ivan Sequeira, Anthony Tave

Port of San Francisco

Ananda Hirsch, Meghan Wallace, Brad Benson, Daley Dunham

Public Health Department

Greg Wagner, Mark Primeau, Kathy Jung, Benito Olguin, Jason Zook, Terry Saltz

Public Utilities Commission

Carlos Jacobo, Frank McPartland, David Myerson, Kathy How, Eric Sandler, Barbara Hale, Dan Wade

Public Works

Julia Dawson, Bruce Robertson, Rachel Alonso, Paul Barradas, Jim Buker, Charles Higueras, Brook Mebrahtu, Julia Laue, Tony Leung, Raymond Lui, John Thomas, Gabriella Cirelli, Simon Bertrang, Kelli Rudnick, Kevin Sporer, Carla Short, Ellen Wong, Marci Camacho, Kristin Lo

Recreation and Parks Department

Dawn Kamalanathan, Katharine Petrucione, Stacy Bradley, Taylor Emerson

Sheriff’s Department

Sheriff Vicki Hennessey, Matthew Freeman, Eileen Hirst, Dan Santizo

Treasure Island

Robert Beck, Liz Hirschhorn, Peter Summerville

War Memorial

Elizabeth Murray, Kevin Kelly


External Agency Staff

Caltrain

April Chan, Marian Lee, Peter Skinner, Sebastian Petty

Mayor’s Office of Housing

Kate Hartley, Lisa Motoyama, Lydia Ely

Office of Community Investment & Infrastructure

Sally Oerth, Bree Mawhorter, Tamsen Drew, Marc Slutzkin, Shane Hart, Christine Maher

SF County Transportation Authority

Tilly Chang, Maria Lombardo, Anna LaForte

SF Community College

Linda Da Silva

SF Unified School District

Myong Leigh, David Goldin


Prepared By

Brian Strong, Chief Resilience Officer

Heather Green, Deputy Director, Resilience and Capital Planning

Nishad Joshi, Senior Analyst

Joshua Low, Senior Analyst

Hemiar Alburati, Senior Business Analyst

Thomas Cassaro, SF Fellow


Photo Credit

Cover Photo, Bayview Opera House: Dennis Anderson/Blue Water Pictures

 

2022 - Letter from the City Administrator

Letter from the City Administrator

Carmen Chu

In compliance with San Francisco Administrative Code Section 3.20, I submit the Proposed City and County of San Francisco Capital Plan for Fiscal Years 2022-2031. As the guiding document for City infrastructure investments, this Plan recommends $38 billion for critical public health facilities, affordable housing, parks and cultural centers, safer streets, and better transportation over the coming decade.

Undoubtedly, 2020 has been a difficult year and the ongoing impacts of the global COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in dramatic shifts in our economic outlook and available resources. That is why public capital investments will serve an even more important role than before as a stimulus for a strong and equitable recovery. Significant updates to this Plan include the addition of the Affordable Housing Service Area and new investments that focus on economic recovery and resilience.

Planning for the care and maintenance of our public assets is an essential function of government. This Plan reflects balancing limited resources with our most pressing needs. Investments like those identified in this Plan will help San Francisco emerge stronger from the COVID-19 crisis. I look forward to working with the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors to enact the recommendations of this Plan.

Carmen Chu

Carmen Chu
City Administrator

New Letter from the City Administrator

Letter from the City Administrator

Naomi Kelly

In compliance with the San Francisco Administrative Code Section 3.20, I am pleased to submit the City and County of San Francisco Capital Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2020-2029. The guiding document for City infrastructure investments, this Plan assesses the City’s capital needs, identifies the level of investment required to meet those needs, and provides a constrained plan of finance for the next 10 years.

The Capital Plan continues the City’s commitment to plan and finance projects that will strengthen the integrity of San Francisco’s infrastructure in an equitable way. The Plan recommends a record level of $39 billion in investments that will improve San Francisco’s resilience through critical seismic repairs and strengthening; transportation and utility system improvements; a stronger Seawall; modern public health and safety facilities; and safer streets for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers.

Even with this record level of investment, the Plan defers five billion dollars in identified capital needs for General Fund departments. Assuming continued seven percent annual growth in the Pay-As-You-Go Program, the state of good repair needs for those departments is not fully funded until FY2027. We must continue to invest in our infrastructure to contain costs and deliver the quality of life that our residents, workers, and visitors deserve.
We know that programmatic investments alone will not solve the problems San Francisco faces. Near-term investments to build additional affordable housing, mitigate seismic risks in our public health buildings, and ensure the safety and operational capability of our public safety departments in the wake of disaster will help safeguard our long-term viability.

San Francisco has long been a city resilient in the face of environmental, economic, and social challenges. The Capital Plan not only guides infrastructure investments but also builds public trust in the City’s ability to do smart long-term planning. I look forward to working with the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors to enact the recommendations of this Plan and continuing to build a stronger San Francisco.

Naomi M. Kelly
City Administrator

Letter from the City Administrator

Letter from the City Administrator

Naomi Kelly

In compliance with the San Francisco Administrative Code Section 3.20, I am pleased to submit the City and County of San Francisco Capital Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2018-2027. The guiding document for City infrastructure investments, this Plan assesses the City’s capital needs, identifies the level of investment required to meet those needs, and provides a constrained plan of finance for the next 10 years.

The Capital Plan continues the City’s commitment to plan and finance projects that will strengthen the integrity of San Francisco’s infrastructure. The Plan recommends a record level of $35 billion in investments over the next decade that will improve San Francisco’s resilience through critical seismic repairs and strengthening; transportation and utility system improvements; safer streets for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers; and more affordable housing.

For the first time, the Capital Plan includes strategies to address the multigenerational need to fortify the Seawall, which protects three miles of vital and vibrant waterfront. The Seawall, its assets, and the people who rely on it for home, work, recreation, and/or travel are all vulnerable to the immediate threat of earthquakes and the slow-moving threat of sea level rise.

Even with this record level of investment, the Capital Plan defers $4.6 billion in identified capital needs for General Fund departments and does not fully fund annual state of good repair needs for those departments until FY2032.

San Francisco has long been a city resilient in the face of environmental, economic, and social challenges. The Capital Plan not only guides infrastructure investments but also builds public trust in the City’s ability to do smart long-term planning. I look forward to working with the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors to enact the recommendations of this Plan and continuing to build a stronger City. 

Naomi M. Kelly
City Administrator

2022 - APPENDICES: B. Governance Structure

Appendices

B. Governance Structure

In August 2005, concerns from city leaders, citizens, Mayor Newsom, and the Board of Supervisors culminated in Administrative Code Sections 3.20 and 3.21 requiring the City to annually develop and adopt a ten-year constrained capital expenditure plan for city-owned facilities and infrastructure. The code ensures the Plan’s relevance by requiring that all capital expenditures be reviewed in light of the adopted capital expenditure plan.

The Capital Planning Committee (CPC) approves the Capital Plan and makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on all of the City’s capital expenditures. It consists of the City Administrator as chair, the President of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor’s Finance Director, the Controller, the City Planning Director, the Public Works Director, the Airport Director, the Municipal Transportation Agency Executive Director, the Public Utilities Commission General Manager, the Recreation and Parks Department General Manager, and the Port of San Francisco Executive Director. The mission of the Capital Planning Committee is to review the proposed capital expenditure plan and to monitor the City’s ongoing compliance with the final adopted capital plan.

New APPENDICES: B. Governance Structure

Governance Structure
San Francisco’s Ten-Year Capital Plan Governance Structure
 

In August 2005, concerns from city leaders, citizens, Mayor Newsom, and the Board of Supervisors culminated in Administrative Code Sections 3.20 and 3.21 requiring the City to annually develop and adopt a ten-year constrained capital expenditure plan for city-owned facilities and infrastructure. The code ensures the Plan’s relevance by requiring that all capital expenditures be reviewed in light of the adopted capital expenditure plan.

The Capital Planning Committee (CPC) approves the Capital Plan and makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on all of the City’s capital expenditures. It consists of the City Administrator as chair, the President of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor’s Finance Director, the Controller, the City Planning Director, the Public Works Director, the Airport Director, the Municipal Transportation Agency Executive Director, the Public Utilities Commission General Manager, the Recreation and Parks Department General Manager, and the Port of San Francisco Executive Director. The mission of the Capital Planning Committee is to review the proposed capital expenditure plan and to monitor the City’s ongoing compliance with the final adopted capital plan.

APPENDICES: B. Governance Structure

Governance Structure
San Francisco’s Ten-Year Capital Plan Governance Structure
 
In August 2005, concerns from city leaders, citizens, Mayor Newsom, and the Board of Supervisors culminated in Administrative Code Sections 3.20 and 3.21 requiring the City to annually develop and adopt a ten-year constrained capital expenditure plan for city-owned facilities and infrastructure. The code ensures the Plan’s relevance by requiring that all capital expenditures be reviewed in light of the adopted capital expenditure plan.
 
The Capital Planning Committee (CPC) approves the Capital Plan and makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on all of the City’s capital expenditures. It consists of the City Administrator as chair, the President of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor’s Finance Director, the Controller, the City Planning Director, the Public Works Director, the Airport Director, the Municipal Transportation Agency Executive Director, the Public Utilities Commission General Manager, the Recreation and Parks Department General Manager, and the Port of San Francisco Executive Director. The mission of the Capital Planning Committee is to review the proposed capital expenditure plan and to monitor the City’s ongoing compliance with the final adopted capital plan.

2022 - Transportation

13. Transportation
SFMTA: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
SFO: San Francisco International Airport
PORT: Port of San Francisco
SFCTA: San Francisco County Transit Authority
Caltrain: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board
TJPA: Transbay Joint Powers Authority

Muni Bus

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted the transportation sector. Ridership losses, cautionary decreases in transit service delivery, and reduced parking and traffic enforcement mark the main areas in which the COVID-19 crisis has adversely impacted revenue streams generated by transit, parking and traffic operations. During this crisis, transportation has been critical to maintaining mobility for essential workers and ensuring access to essential services, while prioritizing the health of transportation workers and the public. Transportation will continue to be just as critical during the recovery ahead, as workers and visitors return, children go back to schools, and cultural activities resume. Transportation infrastructure will be a driver of the regional recovery and the backbone of the city’s social fabric. It is critical that the City provide high quality transportation service for all, including neighborhoods with high populations of people of color and low-income people, as well as youth, older adults, and people with disabilities.

This chapter describes projects and programs to improve San Francisco’s transportation network, mitigate losses due to the COVID-19 crises, and build resilience in the sector over the next 10 years. It is critical that San Francisco takes care of our transportation needs so that the city remains accessible and livable for generations to come.

Overview

San Francisco sits at the center of the Bay Area, both geographically and economically. To support residents, workers, and visitors, the City maintains a vast system of transportation infrastructure ranging from cross-town buses and Muni trains to the San Francisco International Airport, one of the busiest in the United States prior to COVID-19. Regional transportation assets like BART and Caltrain also run through the city, connecting San Francisco to the surrounding counties.

While addressing the operational challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, San Francisco is also in the midst of implementing several major capital initiatives that will improve its transportation system for years to come. From the Salesforce Transit Center downtown, Better Market Street, bus rapid transit (BRT) lines on major thoroughfares, and terminal expansions at the Airport, San Francisco is adding capacity that will dramatically improve mobility. These projects will expand the transit network and provide benefits throughout the city, and are estimated to create nearly 58,000 jobs over the next 10 years.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) manages all City-owned ground transportation infrastructure. Related operations include running the San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni), managing parking and traffic, facilitating bicycling and walking, regulating taxis, and planning and implementing strategic community-based projects to improve the transportation network and prepare for the future.

The SFMTA has a number of short-term and long-term processes in place to identify and prioritize its capital projects. Once every two years the SFMTA develops its own fiscally unconstrained Capital Plan, last published in 2019, to identify needs for projects and programs over the next 20 years. This Capital Plan is overseen by the Transportation Capital Committee, which is comprised of representatives from all the agency’s functional divisions. The plan identifies the agency’s capital investment needs and establishes priority investments.

Over the next 10 years, the SFMTA’s total capital need is approximately $4.8 billion.

This City-wide Capital Plan summarizes SFMTA’s capital needs at a high level. For a detailed description of SFMTA’s capital projects, please see the SFMTA’s published plans at SFMTA Reports and Documents

San Francisco International Airport

Owned by the City and County of San Francisco, and located within unincorporated San Mateo County, the San Francisco International Airport (SFO) manages a large and diverse infrastructure portfolio that includes four runways, 91 operational gates, and four terminals that total 4.4 million square feet. It also oversees 32 miles of roadways, six parking garages, the AirTrain transit system, a rental car facility, a new 351-room hotel, leased cargo and maintenance facilities, a waste treatment plant, and more than 274 miles of pipelines, ducts, power, and pump stations for water, sewage, storm drainage, industrial waste, and gas, in addition to electrical and telecommunications distribution systems.

To help manage its assets, the Airport previously maintained a five-year and a 10-year Capital Plan. The Airport currently reports and tracks its capital spending against an adopted capital improvement plan (CIP), currently totaling $7.8 billion. A major objective of the Airport’s current Capital Plan is to meet increased infrastructure demands driven by historic levels of passenger growth. Prior to COVID-19, the Airport was ranked the fifth most active airport in the United States in terms of overall origin and destination passengers and the seventh most active airport in the United States in terms of domestic origin and destination passengers, according to Fiscal Year 2018-19 U.S. Department of Transportation statistics. The Airport accounted for approximately 66.7% of the total air passenger traffic at the three San Francisco Bay Area airports during Fiscal Year 2018-19. The Airport has also prepared a long-range planning document (ADP) that is currently undergoing environmental review. The ADP includes proposed projects to be implemented as demand warrants to support growth to 71.1 million annual passengers. In FY 2018-19, the Airport reached 58 million annual passengers.  As the Airport and the general economy returns to pre-COVID levels and as traffic rebounds, projects in the ADP could be considered for inclusion in the CIP.

The Airport’s Capital Plan identifies $1.4 billion in infrastructure needs through FY2031. This chapter contains a high-level summary of the Airport’s capital needs. For a more in-depth description of the Airport’s capital projects, please see the five-year and 10-year Capital Plans published on the Airport’s website: flysfo.com.

Port of San Francisco

The Port of San Francisco is the hub of the local and regional commuter, special event, and tourist water transportation network in the Bay Area. The Port constructs and provides land and water areas to support ferries and excursion vessels that are operated by external agencies such as the Water Emergency Transit Agency (WETA) and the Golden Gate Bridge and Ferry District. Though it does not operate any such vessels itself, the Port works in close collaboration with these critical agencies. The expansion of both publicly and privately operated ferries has helped to address congestion in the Bay Area while continuing to build an emergency response network. Prior to COVID-19, WETA ridership had grown significantly and is expected to continue to grow again in the coming years.

San Francisco County Transportation Authority

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) is the sub-regional transportation planning and programming agency for the City. The SFCTA is responsible for the City’s long-range transportation planning, coordinating with federal, state, and other local transportation agencies. In this capacity, SFCTA helps to plan, fund, and deliver improvements for San Francisco's roadway and public transportation networks. The SFCTA is funded through a combination of local funds including San Francisco Sales Tax revenues and Vehicle Registration Fees, as well as grants from the State of California and federal government.

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain)

San Francisco, along with San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, is a representative member of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB), which operates and maintains Caltrain, one of the oldest commuter rail services in Northern California. Caltrain provides peak and off-peak connections along the Peninsula rail corridor between San Francisco and Gilroy. Per the 1996 Joint Powers Agreement, funding for system-wide capital improvements are shared equally among the three member counties, while local improvements are, in general, borne by the county in which the improvements are located. More information on the JPB’s future projects and programs can be found at Caltrain Project Plans

Transbay Joint Powers Authority

The Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA) was created to manage the financing, design, development, construction, and operation of the Transbay Program, including the Salesforce Transit Center and the Caltrain Downtown Extension (DTX). Phase One of the Transbay Program included constructing the Salesforce Transit Center, a $2.2 billion modern transit hub that replaces the seismically deficient terminal in downtown San Francisco. Now complete, the Salesforce Transit Center helps to unify a fractured regional transportation network by connecting eight Bay Area counties and the State of California through 11 transit systems: AC Transit, BART, Caltrain, Golden Gate Transit, Greyhound, Muni, SamTrans, WestCAT Lynx, Amtrak, Paratransit, and the future California High-Speed Rail. The project is split in two phases. Phase 1 saw the opening of the Salesforce Transit Center in August 2018; Phase 2 encompasses construction of the Caltrain Downtown Extension, a new Fourth and Townsend Street Caltrain station, the Transit Center’s train station and pedestrian connection to BART and Muni, and a new intercity bus facility.

A related effort overseen by San Francisco’s Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure will create a new mixed-use transit-oriented neighborhood surrounding the Transit Center. For more information on this neighborhood development, please refer to the Office of Community Infrastructure and Investment Section in the Economic and Neighborhood Development chapter of this Plan.

Bay Area Rapid Transit

Since its opening in 1972, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) has become essential to the mobility, economy, and livability of the Bay Area for riders and non-riders alike. Prior to the COVID-19 crisis, BART carried 440,000 passengers on a typical weekday. Pre-COVID forecasts suggest that demand for BART will increase as the region grows, with 600,000 daily riders projected to use BART by 2040. However, after 48 years of service, BART faces major challenges including aging infrastructure, crowded conditions for riders, and revenue declines due to COVID-19.

BART improvements within San Francisco will include ADA compliance projects to improve accessibility, station modernizations, and escalator replacements.

New Transportation

12. Transportation
SFMTA: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
SFO: San Francisco International Airport
PORT: Port of San Francisco
SFCTA: San Francisco County Transit Authority
Caltrain: Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board
TJPA: Transbay Joint Powers Authority
BART: Bay Area Rapid Transit

With San Francisco’s population and economy growing, the local transportation infrastructure has never been more important to the city’s well-being. Without smooth operations and adequate capacity, residents, workers, and visitors would be unable to access jobs, schools, or the cultural institutions that make San Francisco special. Transportation is also a driver of regional and national competitiveness, allowing San Francisco to propel innovation and attract tourism. It is critical that San Francisco take care of our transportation needs so that the city remains accessible and livable for generations to come. The myriad transportation offerings that run to and through San Francisco connect neighborhoods and ensure that the city is accessible to locals, commuters, and travelers alike. This chapter describes projects and programs that will improve San Francisco’s transportation network over the next 10 years.

Chapter 12 Infographic
 

San Francisco Transit Map

San Francisco sits at the center of the Bay Area, both geographically and economically. To support residents, workers, and visitors, the City must maintain a vast system of transportation infrastructure ranging from cross-town buses and Muni trains to the San Francisco International Airport, one of the busiest in the United States. Regional transportation assets like BART and Caltrain also run through the city, connecting San Francisco to the surrounding counties.

San Francisco is currently in the midst of implementing several major initiatives that will improve its transportation system. From the Salesforce Transit Center downtown, bus rapid transit lines on major thoroughfares, and terminal expansions at the Airport, San Francisco is adding capacity that will dramatically improve mobility for residents. These projects will expand the transit network and provide benefits throughout the city.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency manages all City-owned ground transportation infrastructure. Related operations include running the San Francisco Municipal Railway (Muni), managing parking and traffic, facilitating bicycling and walking, regulating taxis, and delivering community-based projects to improve the transportation network and prepare for the future.

The SFMTA has a number of short-term and long-term processes in place to identify and prioritize its capital projects. Once every two years the SFMTA develops its own fiscally unconstrained Capital Plan, last published in 2017, to identify needs for projects and programs over the next 20 years. The SFMTA Capital Plan is overseen by the Transportation Capital Committee, which is comprised of representatives from all the agency’s functional divisions. This identifies the agency’s capital investment needs and establishes priority investments.

Over the next 10 years, the SFMTA’s planned capital projects total $4.9 billion. Even with that substantial planned investment, approximately $4.6 billion in need is deferred.

This City-wide Capital Plan summarizes SFMTA’s capital needs at a high level. For a detailed description of SFMTA’s capital projects, please see the SFMTA’s published plans at https://www.sfmta.com/reports-documents.

San Francisco International Airport

Owned by the City and County of San Francisco, and located within unincorporated San Mateo County, the San Francisco International Airport manages a large and diverse infrastructure portfolio that includes four runways, 91 operational gates, and four terminals that total 4.4 million square feet. It also oversees 32 miles of roadways, five parking garages, the AirTrain transit system, a rental car facility, leased cargo and maintenance facilities, a waste treatment plant, and more than 274 miles of pipelines, ducts, power, and pump stations for water, sewage, storm drainage,
industrial waste, and gas, in addition to electrical and telecommunications distribution systems.

To help manage its assets, the Airport maintains a five-year and a 10-year Capital Plan, which are generally updated annually. A major objective of Airport’s current Capital Plan is to meet increased infrastructure demands driven by historic levels of passenger growth. In FY2018 the Airport continued its long run of passenger growth, reaching a record 57.8 million passengers – a 7.2% increase over the prior year and a 58% increase since FY2009.

The Airport’s Capital Plan identifies $2.9 billion in planned infrastructure projects through FY2029. This chapter contains a high-level summary of the Airport’s capital programs. For a more in-depth description of the Airport’s capital projects, please see the five-year and 10-year Capital Plans published on the Airport’s website: http://www.flysfo.com/about-sfo.

Port of San Francisco

The Port of San Francisco is the hub of the local and regional commuter, special event, and tourist water transportation network in the Bay Area. The Port constructs and provides land and water areas to support ferries and excursion vessels that are operated by external agencies such as the Water Emergency Transit Agency (WETA) and the Golden Gate Bridge and Ferry District. Though it does not operate any vessels itself, the Port works in close collaboration with these critical agencies. The expansion of both publicly and privately operated ferries has helped to address congestion in the Bay Area while continuing to build an emergency response network. WETA ridership has grown by 78% since 2012 and is expected to continue to grow in the coming years.

San Francisco County Transportation Authority

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority is the sub-regional transportation planning and programming agency for the City. The SFCTA is responsible for the City’s long-range transportation planning, coordinating with federal, state, and other local transportation agencies. In this capacity, SFCTA helps to plan, fund, and deliver improvements for San Francisco's roadway and public transportation networks. The SFCTA is funded through a combination of local funds including San Francisco Sales Tax revenues and Vehicle Registration Fees, as well as grants from the State of California and federal government.

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain)

San Francisco, along with San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, is a representative member of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB), which operates and maintains Caltrain, one of the oldest commuter rail services in Northern California. Caltrain provides peak and off-peak connections along the Peninsula rail corridor between San Francisco and Gilroy. Per the 1996 Joint Powers Agreement, funding for system-wide capital improvements are shared equally among the three member counties, while local improvements are, in general, borne by the county in which the improvements are located. More information on the JPB’s future projects and programs can be found at http://www.caltrain.com/projectsplans.html.

Transbay Joint Powers Authority

The Transbay Joint Powers Authority was created to manage the financing, design, development, construction, and operation of the Transbay Program, including the Salesforce Transit Center and the Caltrain Downtown Extension (DTX). Phase One of the Transbay Program includes constructing the Salesforce Transit Center, a $2.3 billion modern transit hub that replaces the seismically deficient terminal in downtown San Francisco. When completed, the Salesforce Transit Center will help unify a fractured regional transportation network by connecting eight Bay Area counties and the State of California through 11 transit systems: AC Transit, BART, Caltrain, Golden Gate Transit, Greyhound, Muni, SamTrans, WestCAT Lynx, Amtrak, Paratransit, and the future California High-Speed Rail. The project is split in two phases. Phase 1 saw the opening of the Salesforce Transit Center in August 2018; Phase 2 encompasses construction of the Caltrain Downtown Extension, a new Fourth and Townsend Street Caltrain station, the Transit Center’s train station and pedestrian connection to BART and Muni, and a new intercity bus facility.

A related effort overseen by San Francisco’s Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure will create a new mixed-use transit-oriented neighborhood surrounding the Transit Center. For more information on this neighborhood development, please refer to the Office of Community Infrastructure and Investment Section in the Economic and Neighborhood Development chapter of this Plan.

Bay Area Rapid Transit

Since its opening in 1972, Bay Area Rapid Transit has become essential to the mobility, economy, and livability of the Bay Area for riders and non-riders alike. BART currently carries 440,000 passengers on a typical weekday. Forecasts suggest that demand for BART will increase as the region grows, with 600,000 daily riders projected to use BART by 2040. However, after 46 years of service, BART faces major challenges including aging infrastructure and crowded conditions for riders.

BART improvements within San Francisco will include repairing water damage in the Market Street tunnels, ADA compliance to improve accessibility, station modernizations, escalator replacements, and adding protective canopies downtown.

Subscribe to

back to top